Legal Opinion
In Re Juvenile 2006-406
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 25, 2007No. 2006-406PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The juvenile appeals an order of the Franklin District Court (Gordon, J.) denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.
In reliance upon a record that all agree is sparse, the trial court found the following facts. On October 12, 2005, a teacher in the juvenile’s high school informed the assistant principal that a particular student — the juvenile in this case — had a “large pot pipe” in his possession. The teacher had heard about this situation “through other students.” The assistant principal took no immediate action because the juvenile had left for the day by the time he, the assistant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Interest of L. L. v. Circuit Court of Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- State v. Michael G.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. GubitosiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doran v. Contoocook Valley School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- In re Anthony F.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Doran v. Contoocook Valley Sch. Dist.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009