Legal Opinion

People v. Goldfarb

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1971No. Docket 10168PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

This is an appeal of right from a jury conviction of the offense of breaking and entering. MCLA § 750.110 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28. 305).

Objection is taken to the instruction that “there are only two verdicts you can return in this case. Either guilty as charged or not guilty”. This is the familiar Lemmons 2 argument.

Prior to Lemmons, it was the settled law of Michigan that (1) error could not be predicated on failure to charge as to lesser included offenses unless requested and (2) the trial court was not obligated to charge as to such offenses unless testimony was adduced which, if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. LemmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. MembresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. People v. BusbyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. McGuireMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. People v. SanfordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. FreemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. TurnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API