Legal Opinion

RepublicBank Dallas v. National Bank of Daingerfield

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1986No. 9381PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLEIL, Justice.

RepublicBank Dallas appeals from an order dissolving its writ of garnishment against The National Bank of Daingerfield. The central issue is whether the funds in a joint checking account subject to the order of any one of four people can be garnished for the debts of one of them. We find that RepublicBank cannot garnish the funds in the joint account involved in these proceedings because the judgment debtor’s ownership interest in the account is no more than bare legal title. Thus the trial court properly dissolved the writ of garnishment.

RepublicBank has a final judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beggs v. FiteTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Citizens National Bank of Dallas v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Silisbee State Bank v. French Market Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Pearson Grain Company v. Plains Trucking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Southwest Bank & Trust Co. v. Calmark Asset Management, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Enright v. LehmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In The Matter Of T.B. Westex Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Delta Fertilizer, Inc. v. WeaverMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Regenia Bechem v. Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC and Comerica Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  5. Pool v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API