Legal Opinion

State v. Plum

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1963No. 9731PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, District Judge.

Did the lower court err by refusing to permit the defendant to change his plea after sentence had been pronounced? This is the sole question presented by this appeal.

This court, in State v. Lee Lim (79 Utah 68, 7 P.2d 825), adopted the rule that it is within the sound discretion of the trial court to allow, or to refuse to allow, the plea to be withdrawn. (See 22 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 421 (4).) The writer sees no reason to review again the authorities on this subject except to remark that the sentence in a criminal case is a final judgment, and one who would set aside…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. AyalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. State v. HovisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. State v. NanceMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State v. Lee LimUtah Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stephen Bernard Wlodarz v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Clark D. Frazier v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. State v. ThurstonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. State v. GarfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API