Legal Opinion

Romano v. Didonato

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 22, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBohdste, J.

The appeal seeks to review a judgment in the Essex County Court of Common Pleas in favor of the United States Casualty Company. The case was tried on an agreed state of facts before the court without a jury.

Ealph, Thomas and Louis DiDonato, brothers, individually and trading as DiDonato Brothers, operated a wholesale fruit and produce business at No. 66 Cornelia Street, Newark. In July, 1939, the partnership purchased three parcels of land in Bloomfield. One tract was deeded to each of the three partners. In July of 1939, the defendants, as co-partners, began the construction of three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Heal v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Wallrabenstein v. Industrial Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allen v. RafteryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API