Legal Opinion

Reider v. Dorsey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 27, 2012No. 3D09-3141PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a judgment in accordance with a prior motion for directed verdict in a personal injury case arising out of an altercation which occurred in a bar parking lot. The decisive issue presented is whether Appellant, Robert J. Reider, owed a duty of care to Appellee, Dennis J. Dorsey, when Dorsey was struck from behind by an independent third party while Reid-er and Dorsey carried on. On de novo review, we find that Reider did not owe a duty of care to Dorsey to prevent the independent act of the third party and accordingly, reverse and remand…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCain v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Rutherford v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Michael & Philip, Inc. v. SierraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Palm Beach-Broward Medical Imaging Center, Inc. v. Continental Grain Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Mathis v. American Fire & Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mukamal v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In re Palm Beach Finance Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2013
  2. Dorsey v. ReiderSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  3. Dorsey v. ReiderSupreme Court of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API