Legal Opinion

Sherlock v. Strouss-Hirshberg Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1936No. 25956PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

Plaintiff claims that she has pleaded and proven:(1) The ownership of the store; (2) an object causing defect in the aisle thereof; (3) the object being a sewing-stool, being at or near the sewing and thread counter; (4) after the stool caused plaintiff to fall, it was put back on the sewing and thread counter, where they were on display; (5) that the sewing-stool obstructed the aisle and safe passageway of plaintiff, and (6). that the stool was at the counter where the saleslady was pursuing her employment, and that it was a part of or belonged to the counter over which she had charge,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. S. S. Kresge Co. v. FaderOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. J.C. Penny Co. v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. St. Marys Gas Co. v. BrodbeckOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Boles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Howard v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Oelschlaeger v. Hahne & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API