Legal Opinion

Rousey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1928No. 11658PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale, punishment five years in the penitentiary.

It is a rule of this court, uniformly adhered to, that the objections appearing in any bill of exceptions, must be supported either by a statement of facts, or by some certificate of the trial court that the facts stated as objections are true. We are confronted in this case .with the proposition that bills of exceptions Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6 each contain an identical statement, as follows:

“After the witness R. D. Morris had testified * * * that such premises were where…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Copeland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edward Morgan MacKenna v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Colbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Moten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Edward Morgan MacKenna v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  5. Johnson and Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API