Legal Opinion

Smith v. West Virginia Division of Rehabilitative Services

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2000No. 27779PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARCHER, Justice:

In the instant case we hold that the default provisions of new language in the state employee grievance law apply to conduct that occurred after the effective date of the applicable statutory language.

I

Facts & Background

The pertinent facts of the instant case are simple and undisputed. The appellants, Caro lyn Smith and Carolyn Jones, are employees of the appellee West Virginia Division of Rehabilitative Services and Division of Personnel. The appellants’ job classifications are set by the appellee state personnel department. The appellants claimed, in grievances filed on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Public Citizen, Inc. v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Morgan v. PizzinoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hanlon v. Logan County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Harmon v. Fayette County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Findley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Taylor-Hurley v. Mingo County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. v. HuffmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Miller v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Blethen v. West Virginia Department of Revenue/State Tax DepartmentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API