Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe, Williams & Connolly, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant. Roger Biard v. Alan H. Blair, and Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe, and Williams & Connolly

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1991No. 89-50275Published

1Opinion of the Court

934 F.2d 1048

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Wilfried VAN CAUWENBERGHE, Defendant-Appellant,

Williams & Connolly, Real-party-in-interest-Appellant.

Roger BIARD, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Alan H. BLAIR, et al., Defendants,

and

Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe, Defendant-Appellant,

and

Williams & Connolly, Appellant.

Nos. 89-50275, 89-55868.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued May 7, 1990.

Submitted Sept. 25, 1990.

Reargued and Submitted Sept. 25, 1990.

Decided May 20, 1991.

John G. Kester, Williams & Connolly, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant Van Cauwenberghe and…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API