Legal Opinion

United States v. Cecil Knox Priest

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1969No. 26303_1PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

Having studied the record and briefs in this case, we have determined that it is appropriate for summary disposition without oral argument. Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the Clerk of this Court has been directed to put the case on the summary calendar and notify the parties in writing. 1

Cecil Knox Priest, a nineteen year old boy with an eighth-grade education, was convicted by a jury of theft of a government automobile in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. In this Court, he challenges the refusal of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Solem v. StumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Ford v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Ira Nash, Jr. v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Paul C. Porter, United States v. Walter G. Baker, United States v. Frederick L. Hearn, United States v. Larry ReservitzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API