Legal Opinion

Humboldt Alliance for Responsible Planning v. Cal. Coastal Com.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 2024No. A169773Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 11/25/24; Modified and Certified for Pub. 12/20/124 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE HUMBOLDT ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE PLANNING, Plaintiff and Appellant, A169773 v. (Humboldt County Super. Ct. CALIFORNIA COASTAL No. CV190866) COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent; BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, Real Party in Interest. Pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (

16 U.S.C. § 1451

et seq.; CZMA), the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) submitted a consistency determination to defendant and respondent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.