Legal Opinion

Scarse v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 5, 1995No. 1—93—3825PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

Plaintiff Olivia Scarse asks us to expand the definition of "intended and permitted use” of city streets to apply to people who are discharged from taxis into the street at the middle of the block. We decline the invitation.

FACTS

Alexander’s Restaurant is located mid-block on Huron Street, between Wells and Franklin Streets, in Chicago. The restaurant was plaintiff’s destination on January 20, 1989.

At about 10:30 that night, the taxi carrying the plaintiff stopped outside Alexander’s. The restaurant is located on the south side of Huron, a one-way street going west. The street had been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Curtis v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wojdyla v. City of Park RidgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Curatola v. Village of NilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Vaughn v. City of West FrankfortIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Di Domenico v. Village of RomeovilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sisk v. Williamson CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Thomas v. Town of CiceroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Sisk v. Williamson CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Thomas v. Town of CiceroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API