Legal Opinion

Nye v. Murcel Manufacturing Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 1967No. 42811PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

Prior to the new Appellate Practice Act (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18) it was well established that the overruling or sustaining of a general demurrer to a motion to open a default under Code Ann. § 110-404 prior to the entry of a final judgment in the case was not itself final and could not be the basis of an appeal under Code Ann. § 6-701. See Harry v. Scenic Heights Development Corp., 218 Ga. 352 (127 SE2d 898) and cit. It is contended that the appeal in this case, which is based on the overruling of a general demurrer to a motion to open a default and allow the filing of defensive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Undercofler v. Grantham Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. Blackburn v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Harry v. SCENIC HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Melton v. GriderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Bouldin v. MoteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Watson v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API