Legal Opinion

United States v. David Blair Craft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1970No. 24427PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PECKHAM, District Judge. *

Appellant was convicted of failing to report for induction. 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. He was sentenced to two years probation on condition that he perform some work in the national interest for that period. On appeal defendant contends that the Selective Service System made several errors which denied him due process of law; he also contends that the trial court made certain errors which necessitate reversal. We disagree and affirm.

I

Appellant makes six claims of prejudicial error respecting his processing by the Selective Service System.

1. Denial of Personal Appearance.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. BurlichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. George v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. John StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. FraserDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1970
  2. United States v. Jack Joseph PryorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. James Lee SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API