Mann v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Judge.
We affirm George Mann’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon without comment. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error apparent on the face of the written judgment. While the record reflects that Mann was convicted of robbery with a weapon, the written judgment erroneously indicates he was convicted of robbery with a firearm. See Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173, 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Carter v. State, 32 So.3d 67, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).
Judgment and sentence affirmed; remanded with instructions.
DAVIS and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Willingham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- McKnight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- McKnight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012