Legal Opinion

Goodie v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 23, 1987No. B14-86-695-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

MURPHY, Justice.

In our original opinion, 735 S.W.2d 871, we held that appellant waived his second point of error because he failed to raise an objection at trial. In his second point of error appellant complained that the trial court erred in failing to personally admonish him as required by Tex.Code Crim.Proc. Ann. art. 26.13(a) (Vernon Supp.1986). In his motion for rehearing appellant has cited cases for the proposition that the trial court’s failure to comply with the provisions of article 26.13 may be raised at any time. We will respond to appellant’s motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Goodie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Khan Phi Nguyen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. Khan Phi Nguyen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  4. Khan Phi Nguyen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API