Legal Opinion

Louisville Trust Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1961No. 14628PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The order of the District Court, from which this appeal was taken, granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended reply to defendant’s counterclaim; granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on defendant’s counterclaim and denied defendant’s motion for leave to file an amended counterclaim.

The District Court has not yet made any disposition of plaintiffs’ claim for relief set forth in their complaint which is still pending in that court.

Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. provides the only manner in which the court may direct the entry of a final…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Company and Continental Casualty Company v. United States of America, for the Use of Carpenter Plumbing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. George Gilbertson v. City of FairbanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LexFit, LLC v. Bond Street Fund 20, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
  2. Louisville Trust Company v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API