Legal Opinion

Burg v. Health Care Plan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2001No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint against defendant Health Care Plan reinstated. Memorandum: We agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendant Health Care Plan for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it (appeal No. 1). Public Health Law § 4410 (1) does not preclude a health maintenance organization from being held vicariously liable for the malpractice of its physician employees (see, Wisholek v Douglas [appeal No. 2], 280 AD2d 220 [decided herewith]). We disagree with plaintiff, however, that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Wisholek v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burg v. Health Care PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API