Burg v. Health Care Plan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint against defendant Health Care Plan reinstated. Memorandum: We agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendant Health Care Plan for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it (appeal No. 1). Public Health Law § 4410 (1) does not preclude a health maintenance organization from being held vicariously liable for the malpractice of its physician employees (see, Wisholek v Douglas [appeal No. 2], 280 AD2d 220 [decided herewith]). We disagree with plaintiff, however, that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Wisholek v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burg v. Health Care PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001