Legal Opinion
Claim of Chilk v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 29, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Herlihy, J. P.
The claimant is a probation officer assigned to work on conciliation cases, interviewing the parties, and presenting cases before the Family Court. Her salary is paid by the City of New York and, it is conceded that from July 9, 1954 to September 1,1962, she was included in the Career and Salary Plan adopted by the City of New York. On February 23, 1962 the City of New York granted coverage and protection under the Workmen’s Compensation Law to all employees of the city who were included in the Career and Salary Plan.
*426On March 10, 1964, the claimant, while in the course of her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Daly v. Board of Elections of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Matter of Gramlich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Claim of Daly v. Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Claim of Carpenter v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Claim of Cunningham v. Department of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by1 opinion
- Classen v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1985