Legal Opinion

Reichert v. State, Department of Transportation & Development

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 1996No. 26800-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

JzSEXTON, Judge.

This case is before us upon remand by the Louisiana Supreme Court, 95-1775 (La. 2/9/96), 667 So.2d 542. The high court vacated the judgment of this court in Reichert v. Department of Transportation and Development, 26,800 (La.App. 2d Cir. 5/10/95), 656 So.2d 47. The Supreme Court found that we had erroneously excluded exhibits 29, 33, 36 and 37 pursuant to the provisions of 23 U.S.C.A. § 409 and Wiedeman v. Dixie Electric Membership Corp., 627 So.2d 170 (La.1993), cert. denied - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2134, 128 L.Ed.2d 864 (1994).

The facts of this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rivnor Properties v. Herbert O'Donnell, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Wiedeman v. Dixie Elec. Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. McCullough v. Regional Transit AuthorityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Northern Assur. Co. v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. Smiley v. SikesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reichert v. State, Dept. of Transp. and DevelopmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Eppinette v. City of MonroeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Reichert v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API