Legal Opinion

King v. Munzer

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided April 15, 1894Published

Action by Bennett J. King and others against Alfred Munzer and others to set aside three judgments confessed by the firm of A. Munzer & Co., as in fraud of plaintiffs and other creditors, and to set aside a transfer of book accounts on the same ground. Judgment for plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The plaintiffs, as judgment creditors of the firm of A. Munzer & Co., composed of Alfred Munzer and Jacob Mayers, attack three confessions of judgment made by that firm; one in favor of Moses Misch for $2,518.40, one in favor of Rachel Munzer for $1,108.40, and one in favor of Henry P. Rees for $1,018.40. The ground alleged is that these judgments were confessed to hinder, delay, and defraud creditors of the firm, and especially the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs also seek to set aside as fraudulent a transfer of the firm’s book accounts, made by it to Samuel Mayers, a brother of Jacob Mayers,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Becker v. . KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Eaton, Cole Burnham Co. v. . AveryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Frost v. . KoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. MacUllar v. . McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Simons v. GoldbachNew York Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API