Legal Opinion

State v. . Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"WiNboeNEj J.

Is the defendant entitled to judgment as of nonsuit? On this record, Yes.

Defendant was charged in three separate bills of indictment with the crimes of (1) fornication and adultery with one Hazel Church, (2) prostitution and assignation and aiding and abetting prostitution and assignation, (3) public cursing. By consent, the three cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The jury acquitted defendant on the charges in the second and third bills of indictment. Following the imposition of sentence on verdict of guilty under the first bill, and notice of appeal given in open…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. . HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Abernethy v. . BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Carter v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. . StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. State v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Barker v. DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API