Tarbox v. Gorman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Good-hue county, refusing a new trial, after a trial by McCluer, J., without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The action was upon a promissory note, made by the defendants to a corporation named the Batavia Portable Engine Company, and payable to its order. The defendants put in issue the indorsement of the note to the plaintiff, alleging that the payee named in the note was still the owner of it. Matter in recoupment was also pleaded by the defendants, consisting of a breach of a warranty made by the payee respecting an engine sold by it to the defendants, and for -which the note was given. At the trial the plaintiff offered in evidence the note, and an indorsement thereon in these words: “Batavia…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- First National Bank v. LoyhedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vickery v. BurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Caldwell v. RoachWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- Capitol Hill State Bank v. Rawlins National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
- Gumaer v. SowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- National City Bank v. Zimmer Vacuum Renovator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.