Cowen v. Reavy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The petitioners claim that the announced requirements for the examination are arbitrary, unreasonable, illegal and unfair for a number of reasons, the most important of which is to discriminate against practicing lawyers by virtually excluding them from an opportunity to compete in the examination. It is also claimed by the petitioners that the requirements have been provided to suit the interests of a favored group of individuals for whom it is sought to preserve the positions which are involved. An objection is also made to the specification in the announcement of the examination that sixty…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Fink v. FineganNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Sheridan v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Barlow v. BerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Twomey v. McNamaraNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Kearns v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1952