Legal Opinion

Cowen v. Reavy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioners claim that the announced requirements for the examination are arbitrary, unreasonable, illegal and unfair for a number of reasons, the most important of which is to discriminate against practicing lawyers by virtually excluding them from an opportunity to compete in the examination. It is also claimed by the petitioners that the requirements have been provided to suit the interests of a favored group of individuals for whom it is sought to preserve the positions which are involved. An objection is also made to the specification in the announcement of the examination that sixty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Fink v. FineganNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Sheridan v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Barlow v. BerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Twomey v. McNamaraNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Kearns v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API