Legal Opinion

William K. M. v. Anita M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The record supports the imposition of the condition in the order of visitation (see Matter of Darlene T., 28 NY2d 391, 395; Bunim v Bunim, 298 NY 391, 393). Additionally, considering the relative assets of the parties (see Matter of McDonald v McDonald, 94 AD2d 856; Drabek v Drabek, 92 AD2d 722), the court did not abuse its broad discretion under subdivision (a) of section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law in awarding respondent $3,470 for attorney’s fees incurred in defending the proceeding brought by petitioner (cf. Drabek v Drabek, supra…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Darlene T.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Bunim v. BunimNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. McDonald v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Boylan v. Health Insurance PlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Drabek v. DrabekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API