Legal Opinion

A. v. A.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 28, 1973PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This is a child custody appeal. The sole question presented is this: Did the trial court err in deciding after an evidentiary hearing that the. mother (plaintiff) had not offered sufficient proof of a change in circumstances to justify changing the custody of her two sons, aged 13 and 11 years, from their father ■to her.

Plaintiff and defendant were married in 1958. Both boys involved in this proceeding were' born of this marriage.

In 1961 plaintiff filed for divorce, requesting custody of the boys. Defendant father filed a cross-complaint requesting the same relief. When the case came on for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rea v. ReaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Tingen v. TingenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Shrout v. ShroutOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Cooley v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  5. Bennehoff v. BennehoffOregon Supreme Court · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. F. v. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Matter of D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Yeamans v. YeamansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of EllisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API