Bloodgood v. Bruen
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
The testator commenced his will by • stating that he was desirous of making “ a general disposition ” of all his estate, real and personal. He then, in the first place directed “ all Ms just debts to be paid,” and in the next place devised unto his “ executors” all his real estate in trust, to collect and divide the rents among his four children during their respective lives, and on the death of the last survivor, to apportion and convey the estate to and among the issue of his children, per stirpes: And upon the further trust, that if his personal estate should not suffice, “…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harris v. FlyNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Hallett & Davis v. HallettNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
- Clark v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Piggot v. MasonNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
- Rogers v. KingNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ludington's PetitionNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1878