Legal Opinion

Climate Control Co. v. Bergsieker Refrigeration Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1982No. 81-81PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Climate Control brought an action for debt and for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. Following a motion for summary judgment, Climate Control presented an extensive writ*406ten offer of proof with proposed exhibits. The District Court of Flathead County awarded summary judgment to Arrowhead, Inc., holding that Climate Control did not create or have a valid mechanic’s lien, and Arrowhead, Inc., was awarded reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of suit to be determined by the District Court. We affirm the holding that a valid mechanic’s lien was not created.

The key issue which determines the case is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Globe Iron Roofing & Corrugating Co. v. ThacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Benepe-Owenhouse Co. v. ScheideggerMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Rogers-Templeton Lumber Co. v. WelchMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Saunders Cash-Way Lumber & Hardware Co. v. HerrickMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Fisk Tire Co. v. LanstrumMontana Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. Wanamaker Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API