Legal Opinion
Charles Gustin v. Maxey Energy Co., et.al.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided June 8, 2025No. 5:24-cv-00757Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION CHARLES GUSTIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED; Plaintiff, Case No. 5:24-CV-00757-JKP v. MAXEY ENERGY COMPANY, MAX- E-STORES, INC., MAX-E- ENTERPRISES, INC., MAX-CASH EXPRESS STORES, INC., Defendants. AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Because Plaintiff Charles Gustin’s (“Gustin”) Amended Complaint does not clearly demonstrate the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the Court ordered Gustin to show cause, by May 27, 2025, why the Court should not dismiss his Amended Complaint sua…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Howery v. Allstate Ins CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Giles v. NYLCare Health Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Johnny B. McGOWAN, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAULKNER CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Hollinger v. Home State Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Johnson v. TheHuffingtonpost.comCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.