Legal Opinion

M. Dean & Co. v. Zenor

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Dallas District Court. — Hon. J. H. Applegate, Judge. Action of replevin to recover certain goods and 'merchandise. Trial by jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant app eals.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

The plaintiffs are wholesale merchants, and they sold a bill of goods to one Nichols, a retail dealer. It appears that Nichols was insolvent. Some time after the goods were sold, the stock in trade of Nichols was attached for debt by a writ in the hands of the defendant, as sheriff. The cause of action set out in the petition is that Nichols was insolvent when he purchased the goods of plaintiffs, and that plaintiffs were ignorant of the fact; that Nichols represented that he was solvent, and able to pay for the goods purchased; that the representations were false, and that they were made for…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Turley v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Rule v. McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API