Sifling v. Karnik

OPINION

By WASHBURN, PJ.

The “errors claimed in this court” are set forth in the brief of plaintiff in error as follows:

“First. The evidence of plaintiff raised the inference that decedent was guilty of contributory negligence, as a matter of law, which inference was not balanced by any other testimony.

“Second. Any finding that decedent was free from contributory negligence is against the manifest weight of the evidence. Under no possible construction of the evidence can he be found free from lack of ordinary care for his own safety proximately contributing to his death.

“We raised these…