In re Gray
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
In December 2016, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") filed a disciplinary complaint against Respondent based on his referral arrangements with USPC. That complaint resulted in Respondent's consensual exclusion from practice before the USPTO without an admission of misconduct.
Violations: The parties agree that Respondent violated these Indiana Professional Conduct Rules prohibiting the following misconduct:
1.2(a): Failing to consult with a client about the objectives of representation.
1.2(c): Failing to obtain a client's informed consent to limit the scope of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In the Matter of Justin R. WallIndiana Supreme Court · 2017