Legal Opinion

In re Gray

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2019No. Supreme Court Case No. 18S-DI-433Published

1Opinion of the Court

In December 2016, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") filed a disciplinary complaint against Respondent based on his referral arrangements with USPC. That complaint resulted in Respondent's consensual exclusion from practice before the USPTO without an admission of misconduct.

Violations: The parties agree that Respondent violated these Indiana Professional Conduct Rules prohibiting the following misconduct:

1.2(a): Failing to consult with a client about the objectives of representation.

1.2(c): Failing to obtain a client's informed consent to limit the scope of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Justin R. WallIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API