Legal Opinion

United States v. McCann

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 5, 2004No. 03-1174PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

Following an eight-day trial, a jury convicted defendant Dana Dray McCann (a/ k/a Danny Combs and D. Dacques Sonner) of mail fraud, wire fraud, and engaging in monetary transactions in criminally derived funds (“money laundering”). See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, & 1957. This appeal requires us to decide (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the mail-fraud conviction, (2) whether the district court abused its discretion in making two evidentiary rulings, (3) whether it was plain error for a federal agent to testify that, during a non-custodial interrogation,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. PimentalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Morales-RodríguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Miguel A. Flecha-MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API