Legal Opinion

Hopson v. McGinnes

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 16, 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

Erskine Hopson was discharged from his job as a Correctional Officer in the Division of Adult Corrections. He was a State Merit System employee. 29 Del.C. § 5901, etc. He thereafter filed an appeal with the State Personnel Commission.1 After hear*188ing, the Commission was evenly divided by a 2-to-2 vote.2 Two of the members concluded that Hopson’s conduct was “notoriously disgraceful personal conduct in violation of Merit Rule 15.0706” and that the action of the Division should be affirmed. Two other members concluded that the Division had not proved “beyond a reasonable doubt”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re SpielmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
  2. Lambros v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  3. Peterson v. HallSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  4. Hopson v. McGinnesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Avallone v. STATE/DHSS.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. Sullivan v. Mayor of ElsmereSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Camtech School of Nursing & TechnologicalSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  4. Christman, M.D. v. State of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. Delaware Audubon v. Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental ControlSuperior Court of Delaware · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API