Legal Opinion

McGee v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1989No. 18731, 19164PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*719OPINION

By the Court,

Steffen, J.:

The issue in these consolidated cases is whether a confession elicited without prior Miranda1 warnings may be used as affirmative evidence to prove perjury in a trial subsequent to the one concerning the confessed crime. We hold that it may and therefore affirm the judgment of conviction for perjury in Docket No. 18731. We also dismiss the appeal from McGee’s judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of one count each of burglary and grand larceny under Docket No. 19164.

The Facts

On June 6, 1985, an apartment shared by three women was burgled. McGee was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Franklin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Indico (Elinor) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  3. McGee v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. United States v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API