Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Sutton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1992No. 62256PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant (Debtor) appeals the jury award of $9,000 on Respondent’s (Creditor) action to recover an amount due and owing on a promissory note. Debtor has elected to handle his own appeal to his detriment. His brief does not comply with Rule 84.04 in most respects. Debtor alleges four points of error: (1) failure of Creditor to make a submissible case; (2) insufficient evidence to support the jury instructions; (3) improper introduction of evidence; and (4) failure to instruct on comparative fault. We are unable to review the record for these errors, because Debtor did not file a transcript of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. General Standard, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Verdin ex rel. Verdin v. AgnewMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Wilmering v. Whelan Security Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lake Tishomingo Property Owners Ass'n v. KleinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API