Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Inzer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 2, 1984No. 83-301PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The conclusions of the Court of Criminal Appeals are not in conflict with those reached in Ingle v. State, 415 So.2d 1225 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); we therefore deny the writ. In doing so, however, we do not intend to endorse the reasoning or dicta included within Inzer v. State, 447 So.2d 838 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982).

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, ALMON and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ingle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Inzer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Fleming v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Sabiar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API