Legal Opinion

State v. . Cainan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1886Published

1Opinion of the Court

The ordinance mentioned in the warrant, has reference to and forbids such acts and conduct of persons, as are offensive and deleterious to society, particularly in dense populations, as in cities or towns, but do not per se constitute criminal offences, under the general law of the State. The suggestion that the acts and things forbidden constitute nuisances, is not well founded. They lack the element of having been done in the presence and hearing, and to the annoyance of divers persons, in, near to, and about the place where the offensive acts were done. The purpose of the ordinance is to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paul v. WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. State v. . ColeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. State v. Taylor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. State v. . AbernethySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API