Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

As conceded by the People, the defendant’s right to counsel was adversely affected when, in response to his pro se motion at sentencing to have counsel relieved and his plea withdrawn, his attorney became a witness against him. Under these circumstances, the court " 'should not have proceeded to determine the motion without first assigning the defendant new counsel’ ” (People v Humbert, 219 AD2d 674; People v Santana, 156 AD2d 736). Accordingly, the matter is remitted for a new determination at which the defendant shall be represented by new assigned counsel. At this point, we express no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. HumbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API