Legal Opinion

Estate of Bloomer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

1. Bill of particulars. In December, 1956, the executor moved that the claim be made more definite and certain and that a bill of particulars be presented. The motion was denied and the claim set for hearing on February 14, 1957. The claim contains 16 typewritten pages in which the items of service and time spent in rendering each item are set forth in chronological order. The executor asserted that the services rendered to the partnership should be separately designated and that the various items should be grouped according to the particular matter of business being worked upon. At the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Republic Pictures Corp. v. KapplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Cross v. LeuenbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Mead v. RinglingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Larscheid v. KittellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ortman v. Jensen & Johnson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. HungerfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Saunders v. DEC International, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Wiener v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Cordova v. GutierrezWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API