Legal Opinion · Dissent

Department of Transportation v. Byerly

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 2002No. COA01-1531Published

1DissentGreene, Judge

While I concur in the majority opinion as to the issue of defendants’ business damages, I disagree that the trial court’s “mixed finding of fact and conclusion of law . . . forms an inadequate basis for this Court to conduct a review and assess appellants’ contentions.”

*459A trial court’s duty pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 52 to find facts and state its conclusions separately “merely [serves] to provide a basis for appellate review.” Winston-Salem Wrecker Ass’n v. Barker, 148 N.C. App. 114, 119, 557 S.E.2d 614, 618 (2001) (citing Mashburn v. First Investors Corp., 111 N.C. App. 398,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Creech v. RANMAR PROPERTIESSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Winston-Salem Wrecker Ass'n v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Creech v. Ranmar PropertiesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Mashburn v. First Investors Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API