In re the Arbitration between Spychalski & Continental Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtWitmer, J.
The question presented on this appeal is whether respondent insurer may successfully move for a stay of arbitration after the 20-day period limited therefor in CPLR 7503 (subd [c]) has expired, on the ground that it appears that another insurer has agreed to pay petitioner $10,000 for the injuries that he received in a hit-and-run accident.
As petitioner was entering the automobile of John Giles, which was insured by the Utica Mutual Insurance Company (Utica), it was struck by an unidentified automobile and he was injured. Plaintiff was insured by respondent, the Continental Insurance…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Raisler Corp. & New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. StekardisNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Insurance & GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- In Re the Arbitration Between Aaacon Auto Transport, Inc. & State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- MATTER OF YAK TAXI, INC. v. TekeNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & VitucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Sisson v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re the Arbitration between Nassau Insurance & ClementeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.