Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2009No. 52 MAP 2009Published

1DissentJustice Eakin

I respectfully disagree with the majority’s determination that proper venue is in Berks County. Appellant is charged with failure to pay personal income tax, clearly a crime of omission. Venue for “crimes of omission ... [is] properly vested in the court of the county in which performance of the acts was due.” Commonwealth v. Boyle, 516 Pa. 105, 532 A.2d 306, 311 (1987). The Superior Court has consistently and properly held venue is proper in Dauphin County in these types of cases because “the locus of [defendant’s] failure to act was Dauphin County.” Commonwealth v. Bershad, 693 A.2d 1303,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. McPhailSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. BershadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. BennardoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API