Legal Opinion
TULSA STOCKYARDS, INC. v. CLARK
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 11, 2014No. 112240PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
T1 In this original proceeding, Tulsa Stockyards, Inc. (petitioner) challenges the constitutionality of the CompSource Mutual Insurance Company Act (Act), 2018 Okla. Sess. Laws, ch. 254 (codified at 85 0.8.Supp. 2018, §§ 375.1 et seq). The Act requires that CompSource Oklahoma (CompSource) be restructured to do business as a domestic mutual insurer without capital stock or shares under the name of CompSource Mutual Insurance Company (CompSource Mutual) effective January 1, 2015. Petitioner contends that CompSource is a state agency and its money and other assets, valued at approximately Two…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Edwards v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Liddell v. HeavnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- State v. YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Keating v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- IN THE MATTER OF M.K.T.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- STRICKLEN v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
- TULSA STOCKYARDS, INC. v. CLARKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Questions Submitted by: The Honorable Glen Mulready and the Honorable Jason Blair, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2025
- STATE v. BURTRUMCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.