Legal Opinion

Schoener v. Watson Elevator Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 1, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Meaney, C. P. J.

This matter is before me on appeal from a ruling of the workmen’s compensation bureau dismissing the claim petition filed therein by the appellant, hereinafter referred to as petitioner. No testimony was taken below, the only question presented being one of law to determine whether the claim was barred by the statute of limitations contained in the act. The deputy commissioner, after hearing argument, determined that the claim was barred.

That Samuel Schoener, the petitioner, was employed by the Watson Elevator Company, the respondent below and here, and that he sustained an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Florence Thread Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Jackson v. Florence Thread Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Clay v. Firemen's InsurancePennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1933
  4. Freeman v. Railway Express AgencySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schoener v. Watson Elevator Co., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API