Mitchell v. Mitchell

OPINION

GARRARD, Judge.

Eura Mitchell (“Flossie”)1 appeals the trial court’s award of $35,000.00 to her stepdaughter Pamela Mitchell (“Pam”), claiming that the damage award was clearly erroneous, that the trial court erred by awarding Pam attorney’s fees, and various errors in the admission of evidence.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

This appeal arises over a long-standing and often bitter dispute between Flossie and Pam over pictures, home movies, and personal effects of Lester Mitchell (“Lester”). Pam is Lester’s daughter from his first marriage and Flossie was Lester’s second…