Legal Opinion

Tamez v. City of San Marcos

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 25, 1997No. 96-50594PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

In this case, a magistrate judge granted judgment as a matter of law in favor of defendant Daniel Misiaszek, voiding a $275,-000 civil jury verdict against him on the basis of official and qualified immunity. Plaintiffs, the survivors of Felix Tamez, appeal the magistrate’s grant of judgment as a matter of law. Because we find that Misiaszek was immune from suit under both federal and state law, we affirm.

I

San Marcos Police Officer Daniel Misiaszek, with three other police officers, responded to a “shots fired” call at a private residence at around 9:30 one…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Gates v. Texas Deparment of Protective & Regulatory ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. Giles v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Jennings v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Richard HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  5. Taylor Publishing Co. v. Jostens, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API