Legal Opinion

McCleery v. Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Defendants (Con Ed) made out a prima facie case of entitlement to summary judgment by submitting the deposition testimony of several individuals who were present at the accident location, none of whom knew how plaintiff sustained injury. They did not see the Con Ed vehicle run over plaintiffs foot, nor did they observe any displacement of the 8 to 12 orange cones set up around plaintiffs truck as he threaded a length of gas pipe held in a vise attached to the rear of the vehicle.

Even if the evidence submitted by plaintiff in opposition to the motion had been sufficient to raise a question…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Lynn v. LynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Saborido-Calvo v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API