Legal Opinion

Vicaro v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 13, 1837PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Indictment. From the City Court of Louisville.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Vicaro was indicted, in the Louisville City Court, for suffering “unlawful games at Poker, Brag, Whist, Faro,” &c. &c. in a house of which he was superintendent, in the City of Louisville, “ at which unlawful games, money, bank bills, and property, were lost and won.” Upon his plea of not guilty, a verdict and judgment were rendered against him for two hundred dollars. To reverse which, he prosecutes a writ of error.

Various objections were taken to the proceedings in the Court below, and several questions are presented, by the assignment of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tesh v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Castle v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Hooker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1856
  3. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API